Canada Culture TV

CULTURE NUMÉRIQUE – DIGITAL CULTURE

  • Français
  • Cyber-Incidents
  • Litigation
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Metaverse
  • Français
  • Cyber-Incidents
  • Litigation
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Metaverse

No Widgets found in the Sidebar Alt!

Archives

  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • December 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020

Categories

  • Art
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cyber-Incidents
  • Entertainment
  • Français
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Metaverse
  • Psychology
  • Reform
  • Remote Work Privacy
  • Uncategorized
  • Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, More Fair Use Before SCOTUS

    October 13, 2022 /

    All eyes were on SCOTUS yesterday as the court heard arguments in the Warhol Prince case. I always look forward to copyright judgments from this court. This is another case on the application of the fair use doctrine or what I endearingly call, the “whatever-you-can-get-away-with doctrine”. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. Goldsmith is a copyright dispute over a photograph of the musician Prince. The issue before the court is to decide whether a work of art is “transformative” when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material (as the Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and other courts of…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Meet Me In The Metaverse, Anatomy of WEB 3.0

    July 4, 2022

    Galaxy Report On NFT Rights; What About Web3 to Web2 User Generated Content

    August 23, 2022

    Augmented Reality Art Exhibitions

    July 29, 2021
  • Facebook Hit With $175M Patent Infringement Verdict In Instagram Live

    September 22, 2022 /

    The $175M verdict awarded yesterday by an Austin, TX jury in favor of walkie-talkie company Voxer is the latest in the IP infringement portfolio of Meta, the company formerly known as Facebook, this time for using communications technology patented by Voxer in its Facebook Live and Instagram Live features. Voxer first filed its lawsuit against Facebook in 2020. In its initial 2020 complaint Voxer alleged that its founder, an army veteran named Tom Katis, began developing communications tech in 2006 after witnessing shortcomings in walkie-talkie technology during his service in Afghanistan. The complaint further laid out that the Voxer app was launched in 2011 and that Facebook representatives got in touch with…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Privilege in IP Litigation

    December 29, 2021

    Google Wins Decade Old Fair Use Case

    April 6, 2021

    Bell v. L3d Distributing, 2021 FC 832, Inducement of Copyright Infringement

    August 21, 2021
  • Galaxy Report On NFT Rights; What About Web3 to Web2 User Generated Content

    August 23, 2022 /

    For some reason, many people still believe that buying an NFT gives them ownership over intellectual property in original works. The Galaxy Report may have found the culprit of this widespread misconception: intentional misrepresentation. As if you didn’t know that buying an mp3 doesn’t give you IP rights to the song encoded in it. You know it full well, because when you post the song on Twitch, someone will come and take it down, even though you bought the game that included the song. Right! Why would an NFT be any different? Because it is more expensive? Since when buying an expensive painting gives you the right to reproduce that…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, More Fair Use Before SCOTUS

    October 13, 2022

    Metaverse Fashion Week 2022 and What on Earth Are NFT’s?

    July 11, 2022

    Augmented Reality Art Exhibitions

    July 29, 2021
  • Miramax and Tarantino Lawsuit To Clarify NFT Rights

    August 22, 2022 /

    Since last year’s NFT craze, it is customary to mint unique NFT’s from original storylines and film characters as cross promotion of new and upcoming films. However, misconceptions around NFT rights (being seen as a new form of intellectual property which they aren’t), has given some individuals impetus to mint pre-existing IP rights that don’t belong to them or that have been assigned to movie studios. This is what Miramax contends Quentin Tarantino did when he launched a series of NFT’s from handwritten portions of his original screenplay, Pulp Fiction. On a first sight, it may seem that Miramax should already have all the rights in any NFT a filmmaker,…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Augmented Reality Art Exhibitions

    July 29, 2021

    Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, More Fair Use Before SCOTUS

    October 13, 2022

    Metaverse Fashion Week 2022 and What on Earth Are NFT’s?

    July 11, 2022
  • $23M Royalties Scam On Youtube – Tip of The Iceberg – Reveals Voluntary Blindness

    August 15, 2022 /

    On Youtube, just about anyone can claim copyright in just about any video for the purpose of monetizing, regardless of whether they own a fragment of a copyright or not. You will only hear about it when someone gets too greedy (in the range of $23M) after claiming over 50,000 copyrights, buying a series of very expensive cars, getting noticed and investigated by the IRS and at least one District Attorney, and attracting over 30 counts of conspiracy, wire fraud, money laundering and aggravated identity theft. The point is, Youtube knows about it and allows it! Here is how it’s done: If you ever uploaded a video on Youtube, you…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Metaverse Fashion Week 2022 and What on Earth Are NFT’s?

    July 11, 2022
  • Metaverse Fashion Week 2022 and What on Earth Are NFT’s?

    July 11, 2022 /

    The Jonathan Simkhai Online Store features both virtual and regular designs. My last post on the metaverse turned into a 3000 word paper, but we only covered part of the foundation of the metaverse. I’ll take the opportunity in this post to discuss non fungible tokens (NFT). Take a deep breath. We saw that the metaverse is a spatial environment that mimics the real world by providing virtual social possibilities and simultaneously incorporating some gaming or simulation type of experiences for players to enjoy. Three dimensional shared realities, like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have historically been reserved to the gaming industry. Chasing Pokemons outdoors, dressing up avatars, playing e-sports…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Miramax and Tarantino Lawsuit To Clarify NFT Rights

    August 22, 2022

    Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, More Fair Use Before SCOTUS

    October 13, 2022

    Protected: Queering: From Alt-Art to Mainstream

    July 1, 2022
  • Protected: Queering: From Alt-Art to Mainstream

    July 1, 2022 /

    There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Metaverse Fashion Week 2022 and What on Earth Are NFT’s?

    July 11, 2022

    Galaxy Report On NFT Rights; What About Web3 to Web2 User Generated Content

    August 23, 2022

    Augmented Reality Art Exhibitions

    July 29, 2021
  • Privilege in IP Litigation

    December 29, 2021 /

    Section 16.1(1) of the Patent Act was last amended in 2016 to extend privilege to communications made for the purpose of seeking or giving advice with respect to any matter relating to the proection of an invention. In Janssen Inc and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp v. Sandoz Canaa Inc., 2021 FC 1265, the Federal Court was asked to interpreted the new section 16.1(1) in order to assess the scope of privilege to be applied to communications with a patent agent. The Federal Court found that the new section excludes a “non-infringement opinion for a product”, finding that communications relating to the protection of an invention do not extend to an…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Subway v. Budway, 2021 FC 583

    June 30, 2021

    UK Law Society, Future Worlds 2050

    July 1, 2021

    $23M Royalties Scam On Youtube – Tip of The Iceberg – Reveals Voluntary Blindness

    August 15, 2022
  • EPO Refuses To Name AI as Inventor On Patent Applications

    December 28, 2021 /

    (Press Release) Last week, the Legal Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office announced its decision to dismiss the appeal in cases J 8/20 and J 9/20. The Legal Board of Appeal confirmed the decisions of the Receiving Section of the European Patent Office to refuse the applications EP 18 275 163 and EP 18 275 174, in which an artificial intelligence system called DABUS was designated as inventor in the application forms. The Legal Board of Appeal also refused the auxiliary request according to which no person had been identified as inventor but merely a natural person was indicated to have “the right to the European Patent by virtue of being the owner and creator of”…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    UK Law Society, Future Worlds 2050

    July 1, 2021

    Copyrighting Copywrongs Caused By Notice+Notice – DMCA Bots

    July 31, 2021

    Back To Square One

    July 30, 2021
  • Bell v. L3d Distributing, 2021 FC 832, Inducement of Copyright Infringement

    August 21, 2021 /

    Inducement of copyright infringement is a novel cause of action recognized for the first time in Bell Canada v. L3d Distributing where the Federal Court awarded a group of media broadcasters over $25M in statutory damages for the streaming of unauthorized content on defendants pre-programmed set-top boxes. In cases of “whack-a-mole” patterns of infringement where an interlocutory injunction is being ignored by a defendant, like in this case the interlocutory injunction was breached over 175 times and resulted in 10 amendments of the statement of claim, inducement is rather obvious and a very welcome cause of action. It is a known pattern (modus operandi) of Canadian copyright infringers to deliberately…

    read more
    Rossita StoyaNova

    You May Also Like

    Summary Judgments in Copyright Claims: The War Has Changed

    July 30, 2021

    Galaxy Report On NFT Rights; What About Web3 to Web2 User Generated Content

    August 23, 2022

    India Ends Twitter’s Immunity For 3rd Party Content

    June 16, 2021
123

Recent Posts

  • Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, More Fair Use Before SCOTUS
  • Facebook Hit With $175M Patent Infringement Verdict In Instagram Live
  • Galaxy Report On NFT Rights; What About Web3 to Web2 User Generated Content
  • Miramax and Tarantino Lawsuit To Clarify NFT Rights
  • $23M Royalties Scam On Youtube – Tip of The Iceberg – Reveals Voluntary Blindness
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Email
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.